| From: | yuzuko <yuzukohosoya(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Masahiko Sawada <masahiko(dot)sawada(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
| Subject: | Re: Autovacuum on partitioned table |
| Date: | 2020-02-20 06:33:49 |
| Message-ID: | CAKkQ50_=siZssjZdsLbdE-4MiRdEAwKT4PJhsjR=ePGWb0ejew@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hello,
I'm sorry for the delay.
Attach the latest patch based on discussion in this thread.
> > Yeah that is what I meant. In addition, adding partition's
> > changes_since_analyze to its parent needs to be done recursively as
> > the parent table could also be a partitioned table.
>
> That's a good point. So, changes_since_analyze increments are
> essentially propagated from leaf partitions to all the way up to the
> root table, including any intermediate partitioned tables. We'll need
> to consider whether we should propagate only one level at a time (from
> bottom of the tree) or update all parents up to the root, every time a
> leaf partition is analyzed.
For multi-level partitioning, all parents' changes_since_analyze will be
updated whenever analyzing a leaf partition in this patch.
Could you please check the patch again?
--
Best regards,
Yuzuko Hosoya
NTT Open Source Software Center
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v3_autovacuum_on_partitioned_table.patch | application/octet-stream | 22.1 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hubert Zhang | 2020-02-20 06:39:44 | Re: Print physical file path when checksum check fails |
| Previous Message | Hubert Zhang | 2020-02-20 06:33:28 | Re: Print physical file path when checksum check fails |