Re: STATISTICS retained in CREATE TABLE ... LIKE (INCLUDING ALL)?

From: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tels <nospam-pg-abuse(at)bloodgate(dot)com>, Stephen Froehlich <s(dot)froehlich(at)cablelabs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: STATISTICS retained in CREATE TABLE ... LIKE (INCLUDING ALL)?
Date: 2018-01-29 10:12:43
Message-ID: CAKJS1f8=uq9aU82tVgpq=E+bx5hOt3RpSw_QvUP-AMba2ErZDA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-novice

On 28 January 2018 at 10:45, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> I'd offer to put it back to the order of the enum, but I want to
>> minimise the invasiveness of the patch.
>
> I think the ordering of these items suffers greatly from "add new stuff
> at the end no matter what" syndrome. Feel free to design an ordering
> that makes more sense, but then please apply it consistently.

I've attached a patch which puts them in alphabetical order.

--
David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
create_table_like_statistics_v3.patch application/octet-stream 20.9 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pierre Ducroquet 2018-01-29 10:20:38 Re: JIT compiling with LLVM v9.0
Previous Message David Rowley 2018-01-29 09:55:34 Re: STATISTICS retained in CREATE TABLE ... LIKE (INCLUDING ALL)?

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Garry Chen 2018-01-29 13:42:18 Re: syntax error on Function return setoff
Previous Message David Rowley 2018-01-29 09:55:34 Re: STATISTICS retained in CREATE TABLE ... LIKE (INCLUDING ALL)?