From: | "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Request - repeat value of \pset title during \watch interations |
Date: | 2016-03-22 01:51:04 |
Message-ID: | CAKFQuwZ_U=U-5rUjqO5J2wquQRDwCvEMA4V1Vtus0WOTCmT1qg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Monday, March 21, 2016, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com <javascript:;>> writes:
> > On Monday, March 21, 2016, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
> >> What about just discarding the old format entirely, and printing one of
> >> these two things:
> >>
> >> Timestamp (every Ns)
> >>
> >> User Given Title <tab> Timestamp (every Ns)
>
> > This works for me.
>
> If I don't hear objections PDQ, I'm going to update the docs and commit
> it like that.
>
>
Saw it go in. Thank You.
David J.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thiemo Kellner | 2016-03-22 11:33:23 | dblink_exec: can it perform a remote function? |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-03-22 00:59:34 | Re: Request - repeat value of \pset title during \watch interations |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2016-03-22 02:23:18 | Re: Declarative partitioning |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2016-03-22 01:15:42 | Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |