On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 5:58 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> Wouldn't something like a target_rows be more flexible? You could use
> this parameter with a target number of rows to expect, zero being one
> choice in that.
>
Thank you! That does feel better to me. Please see attached a new v2 patch
that uses
a min_rows=X syntax (defaults to 0). Also added some help.c changes.
Cheers,
Greg