From: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Wei Wang (Fujitsu)" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Runqi Tian <runqidev(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, li jie <ggysxcq(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, rajesh singarapu <rajesh(dot)rs0541(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Zheng Li <zhengli10(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |
Date: | 2023-05-08 11:01:20 |
Message-ID: | CAJpy0uCho-qz_wDxxvitkxYJhY+V3EvK2howVW7BUG7mse_L-Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, May 8, 2023 at 3:58 PM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 8:30 AM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 5:11 PM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Now, I think we can try to eliminate this entire ObjTree machinery and
> > > directly from the JSON blob during deparsing. We have previously also
> > > discussed this in an email chain at [1]. I think now the functionality
> > > of JSONB has also been improved and we should investigate whether it
> > > is feasible to directly use JSONB APIs to form the required blob.
> >
> > +1.
> > I will investigate this and will share my findings.
> >
>
>
> Please find the PoC patch for create-table after object-tree removal.
Previous patch (ddl-replication-2023_05_08) has some issues while
applying, so please find the new set of patches. Sorry for confusion.
thanks
Shveta
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0003-Add-verbose-option-for-ddl-deparse-module-2023_05_08.patch | application/octet-stream | 47.2 KB |
0002-Enhance-the-event-trigger-to-support-DDL--2023_05_08.patch | application/octet-stream | 33.9 KB |
0005-DDL-replication-for-Table-DDL-commands-2023_05_08.patch | application/octet-stream | 248.0 KB |
0001-Deparser-for-Table-DDL-commands-and-exten-2023_05_08.patch | application/octet-stream | 167.5 KB |
0004-Introduce-the-test_ddl_deparse_regress-te-2023_05_08.patch | application/octet-stream | 977.8 KB |
0006-Add-subscription-tap-test-for-DDL-replica-2023_05_08.patch | application/octet-stream | 20.8 KB |
0007-Apply-the-DDL-change-as-that-same-user-th-2023_05_08.patch | application/octet-stream | 60.0 KB |
0008-Create-table-object-tree-removal-2023_05_08.patch | application/octet-stream | 37.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Kretschmer | 2023-05-08 11:02:42 | Re: Additive backup and restore? |
Previous Message | shveta malik | 2023-05-08 10:39:43 | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2023-05-08 11:09:07 | Re: Perform streaming logical transactions by background workers and parallel apply |
Previous Message | shveta malik | 2023-05-08 10:39:43 | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |