From: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SQL-standard function body |
Date: | 2021-03-05 05:58:47 |
Message-ID: | CAJKUy5i9hGy-uCGjqmG6T=0TjDbS0mw14sOssjiDVMd0aOTG1A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 12:13 PM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 11.02.21 09:02, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> >> Here is an updated patch to get it building again.
> >
> > Another updated patch to get things building again. I've also fixed the
> > last TODO I had in there in qualifying function arguments as necessary
> > in ruleutils.c.
>
> Updated patch to resolve merge conflict. No changes in functionality.
Hi,
I was making some tests with this patch and found this problem:
"""
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION public.make_table()
RETURNS void
LANGUAGE sql
BEGIN ATOMIC
CREATE TABLE created_table AS SELECT * FROM int8_tbl;
END;
ERROR: unrecognized token: "?"
CONTEXT: SQL function "make_table"
"""
Attached a backtrace from the point the error is thrown.
--
Jaime Casanova
Director de Servicios Profesionales
SYSTEMGUARDS - Consultores de PostgreSQL
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
gdb.txt | text/plain | 14.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2021-03-05 06:00:14 | Re: Improvements and additions to COPY progress reporting |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-03-05 05:55:02 | Re: libpq debug log |