Re: speed up a logical replica setup

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 9:02 AM Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2024, at 6:49 AM, Shlok Kyal wrote:
>
> There is a compilation error while building postgres with the patch
> due to a recent commit. I have attached a top-up patch v32-0003 to
> resolve this compilation error.
> I have not updated the version of the patch as I have not made any
> change in v32-0001 and v32-0002 patch.
>
>
> I'm attaching a new version (v33) to incorporate this fix (v32-0003) into the
> main patch (v32-0001). This version also includes 2 new tests:
>
> - refuse to run if the standby server is running
> - refuse to run if the standby was promoted e.g. it is not in recovery
>
> The first one exercises a recent change (standby should be stopped) and the
> second one covers an important requirement.
>
> Based on the discussion [1] about the check functions, Vignesh suggested that it
> should check both server before exiting. v33-0003 implements it. I don't have a
> strong preference; feel free to apply it.
>
>
> [1] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm1Dg5tDRmaabk%2BZND4WF17NrNq52WZxCE%2B90-PGz5trQQ%40mail.gmail.com

I had run valgrind with pg_createsubscriber to see if there were any
issues. Valgrind reported the following issues:
==651272== LEAK SUMMARY:
==651272== definitely lost: 1,319 bytes in 18 blocks
==651272== indirectly lost: 1,280 bytes in 2 blocks
==651272== possibly lost: 44 bytes in 3 blocks
==651272== still reachable: 3,066 bytes in 22 blocks
==651272== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks
==651272==
==651272== For lists of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -s
==651272== ERROR SUMMARY: 17 errors from 17 contexts (suppressed: 0 from 0)
The attached report has the details of the same.

Thanks and Regards:
Shubham Khanna.