From: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <me(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jacob Burroughs <jburroughs(at)instructure(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Dave Cramer <davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs |
Date: | 2024-02-20 14:04:07 |
Message-ID: | CAGECzQSr2=JPJHNN06E_jTF2+0E60K=hotyBw5wY=q9Wvmt7DQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Fixed a rebase conflict.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2024-02-20 14:26:10 | Re: Have pg_basebackup write "dbname" in "primary_conninfo"? |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2024-02-20 13:55:25 | Re: Thoughts about NUM_BUFFER_PARTITIONS |