| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jelte Fennema <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kirk Wolak <wolakk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: psql: show current user in prompt |
| Date: | 2023-08-28 13:00:05 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRDG-2dEoLu0NXt5k231J-PSnzP5Kzzyx0CbKpOoq+0t4w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
po 28. 8. 2023 v 13:58 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
napsal:
> Hi
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>> But afaict there's no problem with using pqParseInput3() and
>>> PQexecFinish() even if the message isn't handled as part of the
>>> transaction. Some other messages that pqParseInput3 handles which are
>>> not part of the transaction are 'N' (Notice) and 'K' (secret key).
>>>
>>
>> I have to recheck it
>>
>
> here is new version based on usage of PQexecFinish
>
with protocol test
Regards
Pavel
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Pavel
>>
>>
>
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0002-Implementation-of-N-prompt-placeholder.patch | text/x-patch | 6.0 KB |
| 0003-PQlinkParameterStatus-PQunlinkParameterStatus-test-b.patch | text/x-patch | 2.9 KB |
| 0001-Protocol-ReportGUC-message.patch | text/x-patch | 10.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) | 2023-08-28 13:01:47 | RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2023-08-28 12:55:54 | Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints |