From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Compatible defaults for LEAD/LAG |
Date: | 2020-11-04 22:00:17 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRC35Zt5v9EqLxoq1bbLjMTWBTGys2zpd5E+G0s7bG_M3w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
st 4. 11. 2020 v 22:12 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> napsal:
> Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > út 22. 9. 2020 v 2:33 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> napsal:
> >> Anyway, attached find
> >> 0001 - updates Vik's original patch to HEAD and tweaks the
> >> grammar in the docs a bit.
> >> 0002 - add-on patch to convert array_append, array_prepend,
> >> array_cat, array_position, array_positions, array_remove,
> >> array_replace, and width_bucket to use anycompatiblearray.
> >> I think 0001 is committable, but 0002 is just WIP since
> >> I didn't touch the docs. I'm slightly discouraged about
> >> whether 0002 is worth proceeding with. Any thoughts?
>
> > I think so 0002 has sense - more than doc I miss related regress tests,
> but
> > it is partially covered by anycompatible tests
>
> I didn't see any need for particularly exhaustive testing, but
> I did add one new test for an operator and one for a function.
> Pushed with that and the necessary docs work.
>
ok, Thank you
Pavel
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2020-11-04 22:13:41 | Re: Use of "long" in incremental sort code |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2020-11-04 21:58:44 | Re: Use of "long" in incremental sort code |