From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: proposal: disallow operator "=>" and use it for named parameters |
Date: | 2015-01-19 16:14:05 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRBKc0c2uKOnuetxLWFRrEbDkcu=11qL7B7bM4uqxrR=Rg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2015-01-19 14:27 GMT+01:00 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >> I think you should just remove the WARNING, not change it to an error.
> >> If somebody wants to quote the operator name to be able to continue
> >> using it, I think that's OK.
> >
> > It looks so quoting doesn't help here
> >
> > + CREATE OPERATOR "=>" (
> > + leftarg = int8,<--><------>-- right unary
> > + procedure = numeric_fac
> > + );
> > + ERROR: syntax error at or near "("
> > + LINE 1: CREATE OPERATOR "=>" (
> > + ^
>
> Well then the error check is just dead code. Either way, you don't need
> it.
>
yes, I removed it
Regards
Pavel
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
ansi-sql-named-parameters-02.patch | text/x-patch | 11.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-01-19 16:16:09 | Re: Re: Better way of dealing with pgstat wait timeout during buildfarm runs? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-01-19 16:09:34 | Re: [PATCH] explain sortorder |