From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: proposal - psql: possibility to specify sort for describe commands, when size is printed |
Date: | 2017-02-24 21:32:47 |
Message-ID: | CAFj8pRASZxag-r9epsqj-AMw6osGmui56NDdZR3fkd=epem+uQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi
2017-02-23 12:17 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> Hi
>
> Currently is not possible to control sort columns for \d* commands.
> Usually schema and table name is used. Really often task is collect the
> most big objects in database. "\dt+, \di+" shows necessary information, but
> not in practical order.
>
> Instead introduction some additional flags to backslash commands, I
> propose a special psql variable that can be used for specification of order
> used when some plus command is used.
>
> some like
>
> set EXTENDED_DESCRIBE_SORT size_desc
> \dt+
> \l+
> \di+
>
> Possible variants: schema_table, table_schema, size_desc, size_asc
>
> Comments, notes?
>
here is a patch
Regards
Pavel
>
> Regards
>
> Pavel
>
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
psql-extended-describe-order.patch | text/x-patch | 7.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2017-02-24 21:56:03 | Re: snapbuild woes |
Previous Message | Ants Aasma | 2017-02-24 21:21:28 | Re: Checksums by default? |