From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock |
Date: | 2023-10-12 12:46:05 |
Message-ID: | CAFiTN-v0KLV=EsTa85UD9_kZbcc1Y3ehzQmXVxXwm_sbin0KkA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 5:57 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 4:34 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> In my last email, I forgot to give the link from where I have taken
> the base path for dividing the buffer pool in banks so giving the same
> here[1]. And looking at this again it seems that the idea of that
> patch was from
> Andrey M. Borodin and the idea of the SLRU scale factor were
> introduced by Yura Sokolov and Ivan Lazarev. Apologies for missing
> that in the first email.
>
> [1] https://commitfest.postgresql.org/43/2627/
In my last email I have just rebased the base patch, so now while
reading through that patch I realized that there was some refactoring
needed and some unused functions were there so I have removed that and
also added some comments. Also did some refactoring to my patches. So
reposting the patch series.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v2-0002-bank-wise-slru-locks.patch | application/octet-stream | 64.6 KB |
v2-0003-Introduce-bank-wise-LRU-counter.patch | application/octet-stream | 6.7 KB |
v2-0001-Divide-SLRU-buffers-into-banks.patch | application/octet-stream | 18.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | torikoshia | 2023-10-12 13:21:26 | Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2023-10-12 12:27:57 | Re: Problem, partition pruning for prepared statement with IS NULL clause. |