| From: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Proposal : Parallel Merge Join |
| Date: | 2016-12-13 15:04:04 |
| Message-ID: | CAFiTN-syQ45cjLDPzW=D9LcYmzVZTKnReJ67VxYLfo=k+-m8pQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> This patch is hard to read because it is reorganizing a bunch of code
>> as well as adding new functionality. Perhaps you could separate it
>> into two patches, one with the refactoring and then the other with the
>> new functionality.
>
> Okay, I can do that.
I have created two patches as per the suggestion.
1. mergejoin_refactoring_v2.patch --> Move functionality of
considering various merge join path into new function.
2. parallel_mergejoin_v2.patch -> This adds the functionality of
supporting partial mergejoin paths. This will apply on top of
mergejoin_refactoring_v2.patch.
--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| mergejoin_refactoring_v2.patch | application/octet-stream | 17.0 KB |
| parallel_mergejoin_v2.patch | application/octet-stream | 10.0 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-12-13 15:18:38 | Re: Fixing matching of boolean index columns to sort ordering |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-12-13 14:47:35 | Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6 |