Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints

From: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Date: 2021-07-06 09:30:53
Message-ID: CAFiTN-sqmY3BdPgx7FHtqBhtzbWAAaAQVXBbxe_kH4ne6vcbFw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 18, 2021 at 12:50 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 2:48 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> > Or do you mean that looking at the filesystem at all is bypassing shared
> > buffers?
>
> This is what I mean. I think we will end up in a better spot if we can
> avoid doing that without creating too much ugliness elsewhere.
>

The patch was not getting applied on head so I have rebased it, along
with that now I have used bufmgr layer for writing writing/logging
destination pages as well instead of directly using sgmr layer.

--
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-WAL-logged-CREATE-DATABASE.patch text/x-patch 42.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2021-07-06 09:33:32 Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side
Previous Message Andrey Lepikhov 2021-07-06 09:28:05 Re: Asymmetric partition-wise JOIN