Re: Improving btree performance through specializing by key shape, take 2

On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 09:35, Matthias van de Meent
<boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 4 Jul 2022 at 16:18, Matthias van de Meent
> <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 5 Jun 2022 at 21:12, Matthias van de Meent
> > <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > While working on benchmarking the v2 patchset, I noticed no
> > > improvement on reindex, which I attributed to forgetting to also
> > > specialize comparetup_index_btree in tuplesorth.c. After adding the
> > > specialization there as well (attached in v3), reindex performance
> > > improved significantly too.
> >
> > PFA version 4 of this patchset. Changes:
>
> Version 5 now, which is identical to v4 except for bitrot fixes to
> deal with f58d7073.

... and now v6 to deal with d0b193c0 and co.

I probably should've waited a bit longer this morning and checked
master before sending, but that's not how it went. Sorry for the
noise.

Kind regards,

Matthias van de Meent