Re: Memory consumed by child SpecialJoinInfo in partitionwise join planning

On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 8:42 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 4 Oct 2023 at 04:02, Ashutosh Bapat
> <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 8:36 AM Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > > IOW, something
> > > like the following would have sufficed:
.. snip...
> >
> > Works for me. PFA patchset with these changes. I have still left the
> > changes addressing your comments as a separate patch for easier
> > review.
>
> CFBot shows that the patch does not apply anymore as in [1]:
>
> === Applying patches on top of PostgreSQL commit ID
> 55627ba2d334ce98e1f5916354c46472d414bda6 ===
> === applying patch
> ./0001-Report-memory-used-for-planning-a-query-in--20231003.patch
> ...
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 89 (offset -3 lines).
> patching file src/test/regress/expected/explain.out
> Hunk #5 FAILED at 285.
> Hunk #6 succeeded at 540 (offset 4 lines).
> 1 out of 6 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
> src/test/regress/expected/explain.out.rej
>
> Please post an updated version for the same.
>
> [1] - http://cfbot.cputube.org/patch_46_4500.log

Thanks Vignesh. PFA patches rebased on the latest HEAD. The patch
addressing Amit's comments is still a separate patch for him to
review.

--
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat