From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Anastasia Lubennikova <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <munro(at)ip9(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_serial early wraparound |
Date: | 2017-06-28 01:11:29 |
Message-ID: | CAEepm=2aLSaNhhHbkBvgbJGDDkQqOqLoV8tngpuBWHZL2yYTvw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 7:27 AM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 3:11 AM, Anastasia Lubennikova
> <lubennikovaav(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> You claim that SLRUs now support five digit segment name, while in slru.h
>> at current master I see the following:
>>
>> * Note: slru.c currently assumes that segment file names will be four hex
>> * digits. This sets a lower bound on the segment size (64K transactions
>> * for 32-bit TransactionIds).
>> */
I've now complained about that comment in a separate thread.
> It's not urgent, it's just cleanup work, so I've now moved it to the
> next commitfest. I will try to figure out a new way to demonstrate
> that it works correctly without having to ask a review[er] to disable
> any assertions. Thanks again.
Here's a rebased batch.
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
ssi-slru-wraparound-v2.patch | application/octet-stream | 3.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Haribabu Kommi | 2017-06-28 02:07:43 | Re: Pluggable storage |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2017-06-28 00:58:37 | Re: WIP: [[Parallel] Shared] Hash |