From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: psql completion for ids in multibyte string |
Date: | 2016-03-01 21:10:55 |
Message-ID: | CAEepm=2JjPY-v1JWWrJyBone-=t1A7TJRyKSfaseQLzh5sMQGg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 7:54 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 29, 2016 at 6:32 PM, Thomas Munro
> <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
>> <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>> Hello, this is the second patch plitted out. This allows
>>> multibyte names to be completed in psql.
>>>
>>> At Fri, 06 Nov 2015 11:47:17 +0900 (Tokyo Standard Time), Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote in <20151106(dot)114717(dot)170526268(dot)horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
>>>> At Thu, 5 Nov 2015 18:32:59 +0900, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote in <563B224B(dot)3020400(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
>>>> > On 2015/11/05 18:10, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI wrote:
>>>> > > Hello. I don't know whether this is a bug fix or improvement,
>>>> >
>>>> > Would it be 50-50? :-)
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, honestly saying, I doubt that this is valuable but feel
>>>> uneasy to see some of the candidates vanish as completon proceeds
>>>> for no persuasive reason.
>>
>> +1 from me, it's entirely reasonable to want to name database objects
>> in any human language and use auto-completion. It's not working today
>> as you showed.
>>
>>> The current version of tab-completion failed to complete names
>>> with multibyte characters.
>>>
>>> =# create table いろは (あ int);
>>> =# create table いこい (あ int);
>>> =# drop table <tab>
>>> "いろは" hint_plan. pg_toast.
>>> "いこい" information_schema. pg_toast_temp_1.
>>> ALL IN TABLESPACE pg_catalog. public.
>>> dbms_stats. pg_temp_1.
>>> postgres=# alter table "い
>>> =# drop table "い<tab>
>>> =# drop table "い /* No candidate offered */
>>>
>>> This is because _complet_from_query counts the string length in
>>> bytes, instead of characters. With this patch the candidates will
>>> appear.
>>>
>>> =# drop table "い<tab>
>>> "いこい" "いろは"
>>> postgres=# drpo table "い
>>
>> The patch looks correct to me: it counts characters rather than bytes,
>> which is the right thing to do because the value is passed to substr()
>> which also works in characters rather than bytes. I tested with
>> "éclair", and without the patch, tab completion doesn't work if you
>> press tab after 'é'. With the patch it does.
>
> OK, but I am a little concerned about this code:
>
> /* Find something that matches */
> if (result && PQresultStatus(result) == PGRES_TUPLES_OK)
> {
> const char *item;
>
> while (list_index < PQntuples(result) &&
> (item = PQgetvalue(result, list_index++, 0)))
> if (pg_strncasecmp(text, item, string_length) == 0)
> return pg_strdup(item);
> }
>
> Every other use of string_length in this function is using it as the
> argument to the SQL substring function, which cares about characters,
> not bytes. But this use seems to care about bytes, not characters.
>
> Am I wrong?
Ugh, and the other problem is that string_length is always 0 there if
state isn't 0 (in master it is static so that the value is reused for
subsequent calls, but this patch made it automatic).
I think we should leave string_length as it is and use a new variable
for character-based length, as in the attached.
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
multibyte-tab-complete.patch | application/octet-stream | 3.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Steele | 2016-03-01 21:15:32 | Re: 2016-03 Commitfest Manager |
Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2016-03-01 21:02:03 | Re: Publish autovacuum informations |