From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Speedup of relation deletes during recovery |
Date: | 2018-06-27 01:13:21 |
Message-ID: | CAEepm=0bnKTGmi71SZd=9BAMcR72+57ojC75UBFJBq2+DxZthw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 12:16 PM, Thomas Munro
<thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I think we should take the hint in the comments and make it O(1)
> anyway. See attached draft patch.
Alternatively, here is a shorter and sweeter dlist version (I did the
open-coded one thinking of theoretical back-patchability).
--
Thomas Munro
http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Use-a-dlist-for-unowned-relations.patch | application/octet-stream | 4.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-06-27 01:44:03 | Re: Speedup of relation deletes during recovery |
Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2018-06-27 00:16:39 | Re: Speedup of relation deletes during recovery |