Re: LWLocks in DSM memory

From: Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: LWLocks in DSM memory
Date: 2016-08-19 11:46:26
Message-ID: CAD__OuicnfXA7cAv9BrkcFSTNOM-vJZaG-Xh1oK03SHG-OY5rA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 4:44 PM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>Can you specify the m/c details as Andres wants tests to be conducted on
some high socket m/c?

As I have specified at the last line of my mail it is a 8 socket intel
machine.

available: 8 nodes (0-7)
node 0 cpus: 0 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103
node 0 size: 65498 MB
node 0 free: 50308 MB
node 1 cpus: 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111
node 1 size: 65536 MB
node 1 free: 44594 MB
node 2 cpus: 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119
node 2 size: 65536 MB
node 2 free: 61814 MB
node 3 cpus: 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127
node 3 size: 65536 MB
node 3 free: 55258 MB
node 4 cpus: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40
node 4 size: 65536 MB
node 4 free: 46705 MB
node 5 cpus: 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
node 5 size: 65536 MB
node 5 free: 40948 MB
node 6 cpus: 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56
node 6 size: 65536 MB
node 6 free: 47468 MB
node 7 cpus: 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64
node 7 size: 65536 MB
node 7 free: 17285 MB

--
Thanks and Regards
Mithun C Y
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2016-08-19 12:19:35 Re: Should we cacheline align PGXACT?
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2016-08-19 11:14:43 Re: LWLocks in DSM memory