From: | Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [POC] A better way to expand hash indexes. |
Date: | 2017-03-23 19:52:34 |
Message-ID: | CAD__OuiKKnL6qsosdUyOTM0SvMoJX2jJ54boJk9N3Jmg+OYafQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Amit please find the new patch
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 8:16 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> It is not only about above calculation, but also what the patch is
> doing in function _hash_get_tbuckets(). By the way function name also
> seems unclear (mainly *tbuckets* in the name).
Fixed I have introduced some macros for readability and added more
comments to explain why some calculations are mad. Please let me know
if you think more improvements are needed.
>spelling.
>/forth/fourth
>/at time/at a time
Thanks fixed.
--
Thanks and Regards
Mithun C Y
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
expand_hashbucket_efficiently_04.patch | application/octet-stream | 18.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Janes | 2017-03-23 20:07:38 | Re: ICU integration |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2017-03-23 19:37:18 | Re: Privilege checks on array coercions |