From: | Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table. |
Date: | 2015-07-06 15:46:44 |
Message-ID: | CAD21AoBFnrp_Q-n8Xyg77OMDFDybFNd+4uq6ysAVHgVq+vcpKQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 5:25 PM, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 1:23 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 2 July 2015 at 16:30, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Also, the flags of each heap page header might be set PD_ALL_FROZEN,
>>> as well as all-visible
>>
>>
>> Is it possible to have VM bits set to frozen but not visible?
>>
>> The description makes those two states sound independent of each other.
>>
>> Are they? Or not? Do we test for an impossible state?
>>
>
> It's impossible to have VM bits set to frozen but not visible.
> These bit are controlled independently. But eventually, when
> all-frozen bit is set, all-visible is also set.
Attached latest version including some bug fix.
Please review it.
Regards,
--
Sawada Masahiko
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
000_add_frozen_bit_into_visibilitymap_v5.patch | application/octet-stream | 61.0 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-07-06 15:49:54 | Re: WAL logging problem in 9.4.3? |
Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2015-07-06 15:33:58 | Re: dblink: add polymorphic functions. |