From: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_verify_checksums -d option (was: Re: pg_verify_checksums -r option) |
Date: | 2018-09-04 08:16:09 |
Message-ID: | CAD21AoAJGp6ZAC32=p0sv55jFgnMFT8spdu=uWgRmg6ecpOj8A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 10:06 PM, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 1 Sep 2018 07:40:40 +0200 (CEST)
> Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
>
>> > Attached is a patch to allow pg_verity_checksums to specify a database
>> > to scan. This is usefule for users who want to verify checksums of relations
>> > in a specific database. We can specify a database by OID using -d or --dboid option.
>> > Also, when -g or --global-only is used only shared relations are scaned.
>>
>> It seems that the patch does not apply anymore. Could you rebase it?
>
> I attached the rebased patch.
FWIW, I think it would be good if we can specify multiple database
oids to the -d option, like "pg_verify_checksums -d 12345 -d 23456".
Maybe it's the same for the -r option.
Regards,
--
Masahiko Sawada
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Langote | 2018-09-04 08:26:12 | Re: Make executor's Range Table an array instead of a List |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2018-09-04 08:14:29 | Re: Make executor's Range Table an array instead of a List |