From: | Alexandra Wang <lewang(at)pivotal(dot)io> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Ashwin Agrawal <aagrawal(at)pivotal(dot)io> |
Subject: | Re: Report error position in partition bound check |
Date: | 2020-04-10 21:50:17 |
Message-ID: | CACiyaSpQ8BrNn+e_8i59iNRJxZ0CufOVe2kYm1qcujg68WqdQg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 8:37 AM Ashutosh Bapat <
ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> for a multi-key value the ^
> points to the first column and the reader may think that that's the
> problematci column. Should it instead point to ( ?
I attached a v2 of Amit's 0002 patch to also report the exact column
for the partition overlap errors.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v2-0002-Improve-check-new-partition-bound-error-position-.patch | text/x-patch | 15.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jesse Zhang | 2020-04-10 22:01:43 | Re: Properly mark NULL returns in numeric aggregates |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2020-04-10 21:48:05 | Re: pg_validatebackup -> pg_verifybackup? |