On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 5:34 PM jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> hi.
>
> about this issue,
> last email in 2012 (https://postgr.es/m/8967.1353167301@sss.pgh.pa.us)
> """
> Even if it happens to be trivial in the current patch, it's an added
> functional requirement that we might later regret having cavalierly
> signed up for. And, as noted upthread, relations that support only
> one direction of COPY don't exist at the moment; that would be adding
> an asymmetry that we might later regret, too.
>
> regards, tom lane
> """
>
> but now we have numerous COPY options that work solely in a single
> direction of COPY.
> I think now we can make some kind of relation (pg_class.relkind) that
> only works in one direction of COPY.
hi.
patch attached.
also cc to Tom,
since at that time, you are against the idea of ``COPY matview TO``.