Re: SQL:2011 application time

From: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SQL:2011 application time
Date: 2024-03-22 05:33:37
Message-ID: CACJufxEwcjWpmoCb_9Y4vVEF7p0WqCwiBja8ePFDUtEJtLYmAA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 8:35 AM Paul Jungwirth
<pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Your patch had a lot of other noisy changes, e.g.
> whitespace and reordering lines. If there are other things you intended to add to the tests, can you
> describe them?

i think on update restrict, on delete restrict cannot be deferred,
even if you set it DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED.
based on this idea, I made minor change on
v32-0002-Support-multiranges-in-temporal-FKs.patch

other than that, v32, 0002 looks good.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v32-0001-minor-refactor-temporal-FKs-with-multiranges-.no-cfbot application/octet-stream 4.8 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2024-03-22 06:12:26 Re: Regression tests fail with musl libc because libpq.so can't be loaded
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2024-03-22 05:19:44 Re: [PoC] Improve dead tuple storage for lazy vacuum