Re: [HACKERS] BUG #13854: SSPI authentication failure: wrong realm name used

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Christian Ullrich <chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net>
Cc: "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] BUG #13854: SSPI authentication failure: wrong realm name used
Date: 2016-04-08 18:29:46
Message-ID: CABUevEzHJH36jhFZV8Hj64dB+dRpZ=NmehMi-V1xbk6MQFF8Pg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 1:38 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:24 PM, Christian Ullrich <chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net>
> wrote:
>
>> * Magnus Hagander wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 5:09 PM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>
>> It seems like this patch should be set "ready for committer". Can one of
>>>> the reviewers do that if appropriate?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'll pick it up to do that as well as committing it.
>>>
>>
>> Ah, good news!
>>
>> I hope it's not coming too late, but I have a final update removing a
>> rather pointless palloc() return value check. No changes otherwise.
>
>
> Small notes:
>
> * I think it's wrong to have the docs say "leave this at the default to
> maintain compatibility" in the reference section - if anything, that's for
> release notes. And it's the default behaviour. So I just removed that one
>
> * Made some other wordsmithing on the SGML.
>
> * This looks strange to me:
> if (!res || p == NULL)
>
> it's correct logically, the style just looks weird. But maybe it's a good
> idea to keep it to make it clear that res is a bool and p is a pointer. I'm
> on the fence.
>
> * it also needed a pgindent, in particular a couple of return STATUS_ERROR
> were indented in a way that made them look like they were almost in the
> wrong place, and some minor style changes. But that's all mechanical.
>
> Other than those minor things it looks good to me, so I'm going to push
> the current version with those once I'm back on reliable wifi.
>
>

And now committed. Thanks!

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message hector.bejarano 2016-04-08 21:47:43 BUG #14079: Issues with query
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2016-04-08 18:00:04 Re: released savepoint blocking further statements

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-04-08 18:29:53 Re: pgsql: CREATE INDEX ... INCLUDING (column[, ...])
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-04-08 18:27:28 Re: IF (NOT) EXISTS in psql-completion