| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Karen Huddleston <khuddleston(at)pivotal(dot)io>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types |
| Date: | 2017-06-15 06:07:53 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqTc-7u1k2vZ3qLxvSyaXbvNCrc9zMuvyF4-wUzJ8zFKVg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
> On 06/15/2017 04:02 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>
>> The business with "opaque" as a placeholder has been deprecated for
>> circa 15 years; did you find that example in any modern
>> documentation?
>
>
> I wonder if we should remove the support for this, in master. It's been
> deprecated for long enough that no-one should miss it when it's gone. Would
> be one less hack to maintain.
Yeah, the idea has crossed my mind. And do that as well for PLs and triggers.
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-06-15 06:51:30 | Re: BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2017-06-15 06:05:01 | Re: BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types |