From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: increasing the default WAL segment size |
Date: | 2017-01-25 03:26:21 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqSdFOQC0evc0r1nJeQyGBqjBrR41MC4rcMqUUpoJaZbtQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 6:58 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:00 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> No, because the output of SHOW is always of type text, regardless of
>>> the type of the GUC.
>>
>> Thinking about that over night, that looks pretty nice. What would be
>> nicer though would be to add INT8OID and BYTEAOID in the list, and
>> convert as well the other replication commands. At the end, I think
>> that we should finish by being able to remove all pq_* routine
>> dependencies in walsender.c, saving quite a couple of lines.
>
> Might be worth investigating, but I don't feel any obligation to do
> that right now. Thanks for the review; committed.
OK, I have done this refactoring effort as attached because I think
that's really worth it. And here are the diff numbers:
3 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 162 deletions(-)
That's a bit less than what I thought first because of all the
singularities of bytea in its output and the way TIMELINE_HISTORY
takes advantage of the message level routines. Still for
IDENTIFY_SYSTEM, START_REPLICATION and CREATE_REPLICATION_SLOT the
gains in readability are here.
What do you think?
--
Michael
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
refactor-repl-cmd-output.patch | application/x-download | 11.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2017-01-25 03:33:33 | \h tab-completion |
Previous Message | Mithun Cy | 2017-01-25 02:59:42 | Re: pageinspect: Hash index support |