From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: add more NLS to bin |
Date: | 2016-11-08 00:25:46 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQU_xcWzN8GNwAAT_J17RvFaGM3crJ6XO4wO8phkM+xrQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 11/5/16 8:03 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 5, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Peter Eisentraut
>> <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> > On 11/3/16 7:17 PM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>>> >> This patch not being complicated, so I would vote for those being
>>>> >> addressed now so as they are not forgotten even if there is a FIXME
>>>> >> flag added. Perhaps you don't think so, and as that's a minor issue
>>>> >> I'll be fine with your judgement as well.
>>> >
>>> > OK, I just wrapped it in translation markers as is, which should work
>>> > well enough.
>> Agreed. I don't see anything wrong with that.
>
> committed and closed the patch
Thanks for adjusting pg_rewind as well.
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-11-08 00:52:27 | Re: pg_dump, pg_dumpall and data durability |
Previous Message | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 2016-11-08 00:06:47 | Re: Exclude pg_largeobject form pg_dump |