Re: Showing parallel status in \df+

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Masao Fujii <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Showing parallel status in \df+
Date: 2016-07-08 11:57:53
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQ6dQx=rf0TdZJ4Y3rL9cs_d+ueWGBHt-sobfDd0G0d4A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Friday, July 8, 2016, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Fujii-san has reminded me of the fact that we do not show in \df+ the
>> parallel status of a function. The output of \df+ is already very
>> large, so I guess that any people mentally sane already use it with
>> the expanded display mode, and it may not matter adding more
>> information.
>> Thoughts about adding this piece of information?
>>
>
> Seems like a good idea to me. It's going to be useful in debugging

Okay. Here we go. I named the column for the parallel information "Parallelism".
--
Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
psql-parallel-v1.patch application/x-patch 2.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2016-07-08 12:14:41 Re: Header and comments describing routines in incorrect shape in visibilitymap.c
Previous Message Petr Jelinek 2016-07-08 11:37:23 Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal