From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)cleverelephant(dot)ca>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] postgres_fdw extension support |
Date: | 2015-11-04 06:09:31 |
Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQ5M=h=UAOiS3Nw4==hJAioZoYzZgX1fHNcMqOGsMnFDQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> That's still strange to have a dummy object in
>> postgres_fdw.so just for testing purposes.
>
> We could drop the extra functions at the end of the test, but I don't
> see the point exactly. We'd just be leaving the regression test database
> with some odd contents of the extension --- there's not any wider effect
> than that.
Oh, I see. Then we rely just on the fact that postgres_fdw is
installed. Are you working on a patch? Do you need one?
--
Michael
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | breen | 2015-11-04 06:23:15 | BUG #13755: pgwin32_is_service not checking if SECURITY_SERVICE_SID is disabled |
Previous Message | Catalin Iacob | 2015-11-04 06:06:34 | Re: proposal: PL/Pythonu - function ereport |