Re: AIO v2.5

From: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>
Subject: Re: AIO v2.5
Date: 2025-03-17 20:53:57
Message-ID: CAAKRu_atGgZePo=_g6T3cNtfMf0QxpvoUh5OUqa_cnPdhLd=gw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 3:43 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>
> Open items:
>
> - Right now effective_io_concurrency cannot be set > 0 on Windows and other
> platforms that lack posix_fadvise. But with AIO we can read ahead without
> posix_fadvise().
>
> It'd not really make anything worse than today to not remove the limit, but
> it'd be pretty weird to prevent windows etc from benefiting from AIO. Need
> to look around and see whether it would require anything other than doc
> changes.

I've attached a patch that removes the limit for
effective_io_concurrency and maintenance_io_concurrency. I tested both
GUCs with fadvise manually disabled on my system and I think it is
working for those read stream users I tried (vacuum and BHS).

I checked around to make sure no one was using only the value of the
guc to guard prefetches, and it seems like we're safe.

The one thing I am wondering about with the docs is whether or not we
need to make it more clear that only a subset of the "simultaneous
I/O" behavior controlled by eic/mic is available if your system
doesn't have fadvise. I tried to do that a bit, but I avoided getting
into too many details.

- Melanie

Attachment Content-Type Size
Enable-IO-concurrency-on-all-systems.patch text/x-patch 10.8 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2025-03-17 21:38:36 Re: support fix query_id for temp table
Previous Message Marcos Pegoraro 2025-03-17 20:52:38 Re: Re: proposal: schema variables