From: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: Emit fewer vacuum records by reaping removable tuples during pruning |
Date: | 2024-01-18 14:53:12 |
Message-ID: | CAAKRu_aM=OL85AOr-80wBsCr=vLVzhnaavqkVPRkFBtD0zsuLQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jan 17, 2024 at 5:33 PM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> This does mean that something is not quite right with 0001 as well as
> 0004. We'd end up checking if we are at 8GB much more often. I should
> probably find a way to replicate the cadence on master.
I believe I've done this in attached v10.
- Melanie
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v10-0004-Combine-FSM-updates-for-prune-and-no-prune-cases.patch | text/x-patch | 6.2 KB |
v10-0003-Inline-LVPagePruneState-members-in-lazy_scan_pru.patch | text/x-patch | 13.9 KB |
v10-0002-Move-VM-update-code-to-lazy_scan_prune.patch | text/x-patch | 10.7 KB |
v10-0001-Set-would-be-dead-items-LP_UNUSED-while-pruning.patch | text/x-patch | 14.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | jian he | 2024-01-18 14:59:44 | Re: POC PATCH: copy from ... exceptions to: (was Re: VLDB Features) |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-01-18 14:40:56 | Re: cleanup patches for incremental backup |