| From: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | FreezeLimit underflows in pg14 and 15 causing incorrect behavior in heap_prepare_freeze_tuple |
| Date: | 2024-06-21 20:22:44 |
| Message-ID: | CAAKRu_ZSegvRXo7bg+r9v4R33e60zaJ_9r-jLdAL0KuY12etMQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
While investigating a bug over on [1], I found that
vacuum_set_xid_limits() is calculating freezeLimit in an unsafe way on
at least Postgres 14 and 15.
limit = *oldestXmin - freezemin;
safeLimit = ReadNextTransactionId() - autovacuum_freeze_max_age;
if (TransactionIdPrecedes(limit, safeLimit))
limit = *oldestXmin;
*freezeLimit = limit;
All of these are unsigned, so it doesn't work very nicely when
freezemin (based on autovacuum_freeze_min_age) is larger than
oldestXmin and autovacuum_freeze_max_age is bigger than the next
transaction ID -- which is pretty common right after initdb, for
example.
I noticed the effect of this because FreezeLimit is saved in the
LVRelState and passed to heap_prepare_freeze_tuple() as cutoff_xid,
which is used to guard against freezing tuples that shouldn't be
frozen.
I didn't propose a fix because I just want to make sure I'm not
missing something first.
- Melanie
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2024-06-21 20:35:44 | Re: POC, WIP: OR-clause support for indexes |
| Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2024-06-21 20:19:45 | Re: New standby_slot_names GUC in PG 17 |