From: | amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [POC] hash partitioning |
Date: | 2017-10-09 11:14:29 |
Message-ID: | CAAJ_b94A6NCGVkdQxuhLR8x0=20vaD9EH8mQ0Tj8X3M06Tp-Ow@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Oct 7, 2017 at 5:22 PM, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Jesper Pedersen
> <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
>> Hi Amul,
>>
>> Could you rebase on latest master ?
>>
>
> Sure will post that soon, but before that, I need to test hash partitioning
> with recent partition-wise join commit (f49842d1ee), thanks.
>
Updated patch attached.
0001 is the rebased of the previous patch, no new change.
0002 few changes in partition-wise join code to support
hash-partitioned table as well & regression tests.
Thanks & Regards,
Amul
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-hash-partitioning_another_design-v23.patch | application/octet-stream | 86.3 KB |
0002-Enable-partition-wise-join-support-v1.patch | application/octet-stream | 11.3 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeevan Chalke | 2017-10-09 12:10:04 | Re: Partition-wise aggregation/grouping |
Previous Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2017-10-09 10:47:52 | Re: PoC: full merge join on comparison clause |