Re: Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Write Ahead Logging for Hash Indexes
Date: 2017-01-13 03:23:20
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LPBnNQLLreQm5eKEwUxv+9QH_AFdqBR0a+Dn7oAxPdkg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 1:04 AM, Jesper Pedersen
<jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com> wrote:
> On 12/27/2016 01:58 AM, Amit Kapila wrote:
>>
>> After recent commit's 7819ba1e and 25216c98, this patch requires a
>> rebase. Attached is the rebased patch.
>>
>
> This needs a rebase after commit e898437.
>

Attached find the rebased patch.

Thanks!

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
wal_hash_index_v8.patch application/octet-stream 129.3 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2017-01-13 03:32:12 Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2017-01-13 02:43:16 Re: pg_upgrade vs. pg_ctl stop -m fast