Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PATCH: logical_work_mem and logical streaming of large in-progress transactions
Date: 2020-09-02 13:49:13
Message-ID: CAA4eK1LNmPUA3bgF+J_-n7-ge8qjEiAEEgtW0NbJ0086rnqm7w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 3:41 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2020 at 10:55 AM Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> >
> > We can combine the tests in 015_stream_simple.pl and
> > 020_stream_binary.pl as I can't see a good reason to keep them
> > separate. Then, I think we can keep only this part with the main patch
> > and extract other tests into a separate patch. Basically, we can
> > commit the basic tests with the main patch and then keep the advanced
> > tests separately. I am afraid that there are some tests that don't add
> > much value so we can review them separately.
>
> Fixed
>

I have slightly adjusted this test and ran pgindent on the patch. I am
planning to push this tomorrow unless you have more comments.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v60-0001-Add-support-for-streaming-to-built-in-logical-re.patch application/octet-stream 92.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2020-09-02 13:49:54 Re: Hybrid Hash/Nested Loop joins and caching results from subplans
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2020-09-02 13:47:52 Re: Kerberos support broken on MSVC builds for Windows x64?