From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
Cc: | "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "Wei Wang (Fujitsu)" <wangw(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Yu Shi (Fujitsu)" <shiy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Runqi Tian <runqidev(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, li jie <ggysxcq(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, rajesh singarapu <rajesh(dot)rs0541(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Zheng Li <zhengli10(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |
Date: | 2024-03-28 12:03:15 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1JpAcvnfOqF2DQo79pf7Cqp5=3HU5UDwBonWXW4V9ot=w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 5:31 PM Andrey M. Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> wrote:
>
> This thread is registered on CF [0] but is not active since 2023. Is anyone working on this? I understand that this is a nice feature. Should we move it to next CF or withdraw CF entry?
>
At this stage, we should close either Returned With Feedback or
Withdrawn as this requires a lot of work.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | rwxrw | 2024-03-28 12:03:24 | Problems caused by type resolution for the unknown type |
Previous Message | Andrey M. Borodin | 2024-03-28 12:00:46 | Re: Support logical replication of DDLs |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tender Wang | 2024-03-28 12:05:04 | Re: Can't find not null constraint, but \d+ shows that |
Previous Message | Jakub Wartak | 2024-03-28 12:01:28 | elog/ereport VS misleading backtrace_function function address |