From: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Parallel worker error |
Date: | 2017-10-30 07:26:33 |
Message-ID: | CAA4eK1+bEXQHrdxv-Zq7bhL9GZDnGAq0nLJ8kVa35YksF2_1fQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Thanks. I have closed this entry in CF app, however, I am not sure
>> what is the best way to deal with the entry present in PostgreSQL 10
>> Open Items page[1]. The entry for this bug seems to be present in
>> Older Bugs section. Shall we leave it as it is or do we want to do
>> something else with it?
>>
>> [1] - https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_10_Open_Items
>
> How about just adding an additional bullet point for that item that
> says "fixed by commit blah blah for 10.1"?
>
Sounds good, so updated the Open items page accordingly.
--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ashutosh Bapat | 2017-10-30 07:45:12 | Re: Removing [Merge]Append nodes which contain a single subpath |
Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2017-10-30 06:50:25 | Re: path toward faster partition pruning |