| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | LLVM 18 |
| Date: | 2024-01-03 05:04:17 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGLbuVhH6mqS8z+FwAn4=5dHs0bAWmEMZ3B+iYHWKC4-ZA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
LLVM 16 provided a new function name[1], and LLVM 18 (not shipped yet)
has started complaining[2] about the old spelling.
Here's a patch.
[1] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1b97645e56bf321b06d1353024339958b64fd242
[2] https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/5ac12951b4e9bbfcc5791282d0961ec2b65575e9
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Track-LLVM-18-changes.patch | text/x-patch | 999 bytes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dilip Kumar | 2024-01-03 05:08:06 | Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-01-03 03:49:03 | Re: verify predefined LWLocks have entries in wait_event_names.txt |