| From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "Jamison, Kirk" <k(dot)jamison(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, "Ideriha, Takeshi" <ideriha(dot)takeshi(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Cache relation sizes? |
| Date: | 2020-06-19 22:32:47 |
| Message-ID: | CA+hUKGLJVbkGDjWHXbnzNMKw7i7iPsYrU8YHR0JbhGrrc1Sv8Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 4:10 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I received a report off-list from someone who experimented with the
> patch I shared earlier on this thread[1], using a crash recovery test
> similar to one I showed on the WAL prefetching thread[2] (which he was
> also testing, separately).
Rebased. I'll add this to the open commitfest.
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| v2-0001-Cache-smgrnblocks-results-in-recovery.patch | text/x-patch | 11.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andy Fan | 2020-06-19 23:33:39 | Re: hash as an search key and hash collision |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-06-19 22:23:59 | Re: Review for GetWALAvailability() |