From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Streaming I/O, vectored I/O (WIP) |
Date: | 2023-12-11 09:12:05 |
Message-ID: | CA+hUKGK1GwoxONGftaP8M0git=Mo15oKytasY+ChV-2hF+726Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Dec 9, 2023 at 10:23 PM Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
> Ok, works for me.
I finished up making a few more improvements:
1. I eventually figured out how to generalise
compute_remaining_iovec() (as I now call it) so that the existing
pg_pwritev_with_retry() in file_utils.c could also use it, so that's
now done in a patch of its own.
2. FileReadV/FileWriteV patch:
* further simplification of the traditional ENOSPC 'guess'
* unconstify() changed to raw cast (pending [1])
* fixed the DO_DB()-wrapped debugging code
3. smgrreadv/smgrwritev patch:
* improved ENOSPC handling
* improve description of EOF and ENOSPC handling
* fixed the sizes reported in dtrace static probes
* fixed some words in the docs about that
* changed error messages to refer to "blocks %u..%u"
4. smgrprefetch-with-nblocks patch has no change, hasn't drawn any
comments hopefully because it is uncontroversial.
I'm planning to commit these fairly soon.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v4-0001-Provide-helper-routine-for-partial-vector-I-O-ret.patch | application/octet-stream | 4.4 KB |
v4-0002-Provide-vectored-variants-of-FileRead-and-FileWri.patch | application/octet-stream | 6.5 KB |
v4-0003-Provide-vectored-variants-of-smgrread-and-smgrwri.patch | application/octet-stream | 21.5 KB |
v4-0004-Provide-multi-block-smgrprefetch.patch | application/octet-stream | 6.1 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2023-12-11 09:17:51 | Re: unconstify()/unvolatize() vs g++/clang++ |
Previous Message | shveta malik | 2023-12-11 09:11:26 | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |