From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: Streaming read-ready sequential scan code |
Date: | 2024-04-07 01:25:11 |
Message-ID: | CA+hUKG+h8Whpv0YsJqjMVkjYX+80fTVc6oi-V+zxJvykLpLHYQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I found a bug in read_stream.c that could be hit with Melanie's
streaming seq scan patch with parallelism enabled and certain buffer
pool conditions. Short version: there is an edge case where an "if"
needed to be a "while", or we could lose a few blocks. Here's the fix
for that, longer explanation in commit message.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Fix-bug-in-read_stream.c.patch | text/x-patch | 1.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Melanie Plageman | 2024-04-07 01:33:51 | Re: Streaming read-ready sequential scan code |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-04-07 00:53:56 | Re: psql's FETCH_COUNT (cursor) is not being respected for CTEs |