From: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | David Christensen <david(dot)christensen(at)crunchydata(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] add relation and block-level filtering to pg_waldump |
Date: | 2022-03-24 11:26:43 |
Message-ID: | CA+hUKG+h-1qbQS0w0ARR73gw+Mv1fcxVZaFMycQS3JGc8iZiZA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 12:01 AM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> Or even: Why are we exposing fork *numbers* in the user interface?
> Even low-level tools such as pageinspect use fork *names* in their
> interface.
I wondered about that but thought it seemed OK for such a low level
tool. It's a fair point though, especially if other low level tools
are doing that. Here's a patch to change it.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Use-fork-names-not-numbers-in-pg_waldump-option.patch | text/x-patch | 3.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jesper Pedersen | 2022-03-24 11:32:14 | Re: MDAM techniques and Index Skip Scan patch |
Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2022-03-24 11:01:47 | Re: [PATCH] add relation and block-level filtering to pg_waldump |