From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Shulgin, Oleksandr" <oleksandr(dot)shulgin(at)zalando(dot)de>, Scott Mead <scottm(at)openscg(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_hba_lookup function to get all matching pg_hba.conf entries |
Date: | 2016-04-08 21:02:12 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmobyv7TOxY-LE8RZyeW1hM5fQ36M0JU5ZmmgdJWHWVCxyQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 4:36 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 3:24 PM, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>>> Can one of the reviewers decide if this is ready to commit? I fear it
>>> will be pushed to the next CF otherwise. I don't think the committers
>>> have time to make that determination today...
>
>> Well, it's not getting committed unless some committer determines that
>> it is ready to commit.
>
> I took a quick look; IMO it is certainly not ready to commit.
OK, marked Returned with Feedback. Hopefully the patch authors will
find your feedback useful.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Steele | 2016-04-08 21:11:53 | Re: snapshot too old, configured by time |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2016-04-08 20:47:56 | Re: Weighted Stats |