From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY |
Date: | 2018-11-16 14:38:40 |
Message-ID: | CA+Tgmob1o8UUzoTHnS+zMfs37iOLCFzc4LdwgQJ65rEu-WZ6oQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 8:58 PM Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> The partition_bounds_copy() is not because of your changes, it's there in
> HEAD.
OK, but it seems to me that your version of my patch rearranges the
code more than necessary.
How about the attached?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v3-0001-Reduce-unnecessary-list-construction-in-RelationB.patch | application/octet-stream | 11.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-11-16 14:55:26 | Re: Convert MAX_SAOP_ARRAY_SIZE to new guc |
Previous Message | Justin Pryzby | 2018-11-16 14:38:26 | Re: pg11.1 jit segv |