From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE |
Date: | 2022-11-18 17:50:56 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoZQJBv74F_eXTcooq2dh7MBn1EdFOJvFf2dm_cneYsWog@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 7:24 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> But I'm fine if you'd like to move on with the SET ROLE privilege
> instead, as long as we believe it grants a stable set of capabilities
> (and conversely, that if the SET ROLE privilege is revoked, that it
> revokes a stable set of capabilities).
OK.
Here's a rebased v3 to see what cfbot thinks.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v3-0001-Add-a-SET-option-to-the-GRANT-command.patch | application/octet-stream | 52.8 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2022-11-18 18:26:56 | Re: Allow single table VACUUM in transaction block |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2022-11-18 17:32:10 | Re: Avoid double lookup in pgstat_fetch_stat_tabentry() |