From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: assessing parallel-safety |
Date: | 2015-05-21 16:49:04 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYVuf1TFFAHgGGYXeZqsGGKf4n1OemL2kaoFCGTazubPg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
> Looks like one of the patches I applied is newer than the one in your list:
>
> HEAD Commit-id: 13a10c0ccd984643ef88997ac177da7c4b7e46a6
> parallel-mode-v9.patch
> assess-parallel-safety-v4.patch
> parallel-heap-scan.patch
> parallel_seqscan_v11.patch
This patch hasn't been updated for a while, so here is a rebased
version now that we're hopefully mostly done making changes to
pg_proc.h for 9.5. parallel-mode-v10 was mostly committed, and
parallel-heap-scan has now been incorporated into the parallel_seqscan
patch. So you should now be able to test this feature by applying
just this patch, and the new version of the parallel seqscan patch
which I am given to understand that Amit will be posting pretty soon.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
assess-parallel-safety-v5.patch | application/x-patch | 1.0 MB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2015-05-21 16:51:54 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT DO UPDATE with _any_ constraint |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-05-21 16:36:38 | Re: Missing importing option of postgres_fdw |